The "mandatory parentheses on zero-argument calls" rule (language-
rationale.adoc) was enforced in expression position but NOT in statement
position: a bare `Foo;`, `Obj.Method;`, or `Obj.Free;` used as a statement
compiled silently, building a paren-less TProcCall / TMethodCallStmt. Issue
#148 reported `tester.print;` (a unit's global object method call) being
accepted without its mandatory ().
The statement parser now raises the same "requires () for a call" diagnostic
the inherited-call and expression-position paths already use, at the two
fall-through sites:
* bare unqualified call `Foo` with no '(' (the final ProcCall else-branch);
* bare `Obj.Method` with no '(' and no further '.' chain.
Field reads, field assignments, indexed writes, and '.'-chains are unaffected
(only a terminating bare reference is rejected). Expression-position calls
were already enforced.
Enforcing the rule required the compiler, RTL, and stdlib to comply first
(self-hosting): swept bare calls in uSemantic (Flush/RepairGenericInstances),
runtime.arc/runtime.exc (_libc_abort), blaise.codegen.native.backend
(FAsm.AppendLine), and a json.writer doc example. The test suite embedded
many bare calls in inline program strings — all updated to carry (); adding
() never changes behaviour since these were always calls.
cp.test.parser.pas gains two parse-error tests (proc and method bare calls);
the old TestProcCall_NoParens, which asserted the bug, is inverted. grammar.ebnf
SubscriptMethodCall made parens mandatory and an example corrected; rationale
notes statement-position enforcement.
50b8d75e6d